SolderSmoke Podcast #236 is available!
http://soldersmoke.com/soldersmoke236.mp3
Winterfest! Many Boatanchors. Lots of old good analog test gear. Talk with Dean KK4DAS. Met up with Armand WA1UQO and Charles AI4OT.
SolderSmoke Daily News — Ham Radio Blog
Serving the worldwide community of radio-electronic homebrewers. Providing blog support to the SolderSmoke podcast: http://soldersmoke.com
SolderSmoke Podcast #236 is available!
http://soldersmoke.com/soldersmoke236.mp3
Winterfest! Many Boatanchors. Lots of old good analog test gear. Talk with Dean KK4DAS. Met up with Armand WA1UQO and Charles AI4OT.
The author of the software seems very cool”
My name is Alfredo Accattatis; I love electronics and software, and I have been working for years in commercial companies as software/firmware engineer and software designer. I’ve been writing programs for embedded systems (with DSP and MICROCONTROLLERS), for PC, for Avionic Computers and even for Mainframes, using C, C++, Pascal, Ada, REXX and assembly. I starting write VA during my free time just for fun and using (also) my DSP experience. The program was and is completely FREE.
More info about Alfredo here:
https://www.sillanumsoft.org/about_the_author.htm
Do you folks think I need to buy the kind of True RMS Audio Voltmeter that is being used at the end of the above video?
SolderSmoke Podcast #235 is available for download:
To re-cap: The problem became evident when trying to “net” or “spot” my transmitter onto my receive frequency. Around 18.116 MHz, I could hear at least two tones in the receiver as I moved the transmitter frequency. I needed to get rid of the extra tone.
First, thanks to all who sent in suggestions. They came in literally from around the world, and this is a demonstration of the IBEW in action. I used or at least tried all of them. They were all good ideas.
Following Vasily Ivananeko’s pseudonymous suggestion I rebuilt the carrier oscillator (apologies to G3YCC). I used the carrier oscillator/buffer circuit from Farhan’s BITX20.
Henk PA0EME said I should look at the signal level at the input ports of the NE602 mixer. Henk was right — the VXO input was far too high. I lowered it, but the problem persisted.
At first, I thought that the spur in question was so small that it would not show up on the air. I could not see it in the TX output using my TinySA spectrum analyzer. That was good news and bad news: Good that it was not showing up on the air, bad that I could not see it in the TinySA and use that image in the exorcism.
At first I thought that the spur was being caused by the 10th harmonic of the carrier oscillator and the third harmonic of the VXO. This seemed to fit. So, following VK3YE’s sage advice, I built a little 69 MHz series LC trap (using a coil sent by AA1TJ, on a board CNC’d by Pete N6QW). That trap succeeded spectacularly in crushing the 10 harmonic. Look at these before and after shots on the TinySA:
Spectacular right? But guess what? The problem was still there.
I scrutinized the situation once more. I realized that the spur would be more visible if I put the TinySA on the input of the transmitter’s PA (a JBOT amp designed by Farhan) as opposed to putting it on the output. Watching the spur and the needed signal move in the TinySA as I tuned the VXO, I realized that they were moving in opposite directions. This indicated that the spur was the result of a carrier oscillator harmonic MINUS a VXO-generated frequency (as the VXO frequency increased, the spur frequency decreased). Looking at my EXCEL spread sheet, I could see it: 8th harmonic of the carrier oscillator MINUS the main output of the VXO.
To confirm this, I plugged the values into W7ZOI’s Spurtune program. Yes, the spur popped up and moved as predicted.
For further confirmation I shut down the carrier oscillator by pulling the crystal from the socket, and then just clipped in a 5.176 MHz signal from my HP-8640B signal generator (thanks KB3SII and W2DAB). Boom! On the TinySA, the spur disappeared. Now I at least knew what the problem was: a harmonic from the carrier oscillator.
Following good troubleshooting practice, I turned off the gear and went to bed. When I woke up, an idea came to me: Before launching into a lot of filtering and shielding, just try running the carrier oscillator at a lower voltage, seeing if doing so might reduce the harmonic output. I disconnected the carrier oscillator board from the main supply and clipped in a variable voltage bench supply. Watching the signal on my TinySA, I watched as the spur completely disappeared as I reduced the voltage from around 13V to 10V (see video above). The main signal frequency level did not change much. I tested this by listening for the hated extra tones. They were gone. Exorcised.
Key lessons:
— Spur problems are difficult to troubleshoot. Armstrong’s superhet architecture is, of course, great, but this is definitely one of the pitfalls. Single conversion makes life easier. IF selection is very important. Choose wisely!
— When looking at the TinySA as you tune the rig, pay attention to which way the spur is moving. This provides an important clue regarding the combination of harmonic you are dealing with.
— The TinySA is a very useful tool. It seems like it is easier to use than the NanoVNA (which is also a fantastic tool).
— It can be fun and rewarding to re-visit old projects. In the years between original construction and the re-look, new test gear has become available, and the skill and experience of the builder has improved. So problems that once seemed insurmountable become fix-able.
— Thinking through a problem and thinking about possible solutions is very important. It pays to step away from the bench to think and rest. Rome wasn’t built in a day. Here’s a rough block diagram that I drew up (noodled!) while trying to figure out this problem:
OM Grayson was on the HRWB podcast with George Zaf and company. This was a really informative and entertaining session. For example, when asked if special precautions are needed when working with thermatrons, Grayson replies, “Well, try not to swallow anything… and don’t sit on the thermatrons.” Words to live by my friends. Grayson’s story about cooking Tektronix scopes in a refrigerator re-purposed as an oven (after cleaning the ‘scope with a Home Depot power washer) is the kind of practical advice that readers of this blog REALLY NEED!
Rob Sherwood NC0B is one of the real authorities on receiver performance. Many of us have relied on his ratings of commercial receivers for many years. His recent presentation to the Madison DX Club has a lot of really interesting information. There is also, I think, some stuff that homebrewers will find distressing.
Just some things that I noticed:
— Rob mentioned a move back to 9 MHz IF filters and a move away from dual-conversion rigs with a high IF. He also mentioned the combination of a 9 MHz IF and a 5 MHz VFO as a way of easily getting on both 75 and 20 meters.
— Rob discussed phase noise from synthesizers, a topic we discussed at length (some would say ad nauseum!) a year or so ago.
— Rob really praised the “Pure Signal” system of one of the SDR manufacturers. He showed the completely rectangular waterfall display of a Pure Signal transmitter. I’m afraid that simple crystal rigs might never live up to this standard. An embrace of this high standard could discourage the construction of simpler, HDR rigs. We should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good!
— We often hear SSB ops complaining that some other SSB op is “splattering all over the band.” It often turns out that what is really happening is that a clean SSB signal is just overloading the receiver of an operator who does not know how to turn off his pre-amp or turn on an attenuator. Rob shows us how to really know if the problem is in fact at the other end: He looks at key clicks from two different CW signals on 160 meters. Both are at roughly the same level in his receiver But one is clicking all over the place while the other is not. With this kind of comparative info, we can be sure that the problem is the transmitting station’s fault.
— In discussing when to turn on the pre-amp (or the attenuator) Rob revives the old practice of just listening to the band noise. If you can hear the band noise when you switch from dummy load to receive antenna, you have enough RF gain. Adding more will only make things worse.
— There was an interesting question about how to evaluate the performance of receivers when there are many signals inside the receiver’s passband. This is the case with FT-8. Rob said this situation needs more research.
I don’t mean to be critical here — Rob is the guy who evaluated commercial rigs. And he is a contester. So his presentation is, of necessity, going to have a very “appliance operator” orientation. There seems to be an assumption that the only “rigs” that modern hams can use are commercial products. At one point Rob admits that most hams just can’t repair these rigs. There is much for homebrewers to learn from experts like Rob, but presentations like this also remind us of what a tiny minority we really are, and how most hams have moved completely away from the old ham tradition of building our own rigs.
Thanks to Rob Sherwood and the Madison DX Club. And thanks to EI7GL for alerting us to this important presentation.