Category: HW-101

How many of you guys have changed the clutch on a Heathkit HW-101 (or similar rig)?

That circular thing on the right is the “Plastic Clutch” on the Heathkit HW-101. Mine dried out and shattered when I pushed the “Zero Set” button on the from ot the HW-101. I heard it crack. I cut out a piece of plastic of the right size. That replacement clutch has been in there for about 30 years now.

I know of one other guy who has replaced the clutch on a HW-101 (Will, N5OLA). Let us know if you have done this too. Put a comment down below.

Farhan’s Amazing Knack Story: From a Boyhood SW Receiver to the Design of the sBITX SDR

The presentation starts at about the 4 minute point.

I think if I were only allowed to watch one YouTube video in the next year, I’d make it this one.

In this amazing RSGB video, Ashhar Farhan VU2ESE takes us back to his earliest days as a radio amateur. He tells us about his very early desire to build radios, his early projects, and his personal evolution as a designer and builder, from a simple DC receiver, to the BITX, the Minima, the uBITX and now the hybrid HDR/SDR sBITX.

There is a lot of homebrew wisdom and tribal knowledge in this video. And we learn so many hitherto unknown details about the rigs that have become so important to us:

— Farhan had the EMRFD book with him on the famous flight from Sweden to India during which the BITX was designed.

— We learn about the origins of the BITX oscillator circuits, and that the VFO and BFO are essentially the same.

— I was really pleased that Farhan included a picture of my HB BITX17 rig in his presentation.

— Farhan discusses the difficulties he faced in obtaining needed parts in India.

— We actually see the nylon washers that Farhan used in the original BITX.

— Farhan discusses his early system for measuring coil inductance.

— In addition the huge contribution of EMRFD, Farhan talks about how he was helped by Pat Hawker G3VA’s writing, and the ARRL’s SSB Handbook.

— Farhkan talks about his Tex 465 ‘scope and his building of a Spectrum Analyzer.

— We see his evolution to dual conversion. We see the conceptual birth of the Minima and the birth (thanks Wes!) of the TIA amps. I didn’t know about the HF-1. Then Farhan designed the uBITX and now the sBITX.

— Farhan talks about his practice of taking the pictures of new rigs with the new rig sitting atop the book that was most important in its design and construction. FB.

— I was really blown away by Farhan’s presentation of how the uBITX advertisement was inspired by and in many ways based on the Heathkit ad for an HW-101. Amazing.

— I learned a lot from Farhan’s discussion of SDR theory. I pledge to spend more time with this. I really like Farhan’s hybrid HDR/SDR approach.

— But I have a question: Farhan seems to say that we’d need a big expensive GOOGL computer to do the direct sampling HF SDR. But doesn’t the little RTL-SDR do just that? Without a GOOGL?

— Great to see Wes’s AFTIA being used in the sBITX.

— Really cool that Farhan has his mind on VHF transverters when designing the sBITX. I liked use of the TCXO module to free up one of the Si5351 clock outputs. FB. And great to include an idea from Hans in this rig.

Thanks very much to Farhan (who stayed up until 3 am to do this!) and to the RSGB for hosting.

Chuck Penson’s Amazing New Book about Heathkit Amateur Products

I was very pleased to read that Chuck Penson WA7ZZE was publishing a book about Heathkit’s amateur radio products. His book is a really great guide, providing a lot of fascinating information, stuff that even those of us who have spent decades with pieces of Heath gear didn’t know. For example, I never knew that an after-market dial had been available for the HW-101. And I didn’t know that the Indian names used for many of the Heath rigs (Comanche, Apache, etc.) resulted from a suggestion from Roger Mace’s wife, who was Native American.

Chuck’s book arrived just as I was putting my DX-40 novice transmitter back on the air after almost 50 years. TRGHS. Who knew that there were TWO versions of the DX-40? I didn’t, but Chuck did, and his book explained how to spot the difference (flashlight through the side vents — I have the very slightly more modern version).
When I opened the book for my first peek inside, the page opened to the QF-1 Q multiplier. I immediately felt guilty about having brutally cannibalized several (well maybe more than several) of these things. But right there in the text Chuck repeats my justification for the carnage: He notes that the tuning cap has a nice 14:1 turns ratio. Exactly. How could I NOT pull those beautiful variable caps out of that old regen device, for re-use in superhet receivers and BITX transceivers?

This is a wonderful book that belongs in the workshop libraries of all those who have used and loved Heathkits over the years.

Order yours here:

Thanks a lot Chuck for making such a great contribution to the radio art and to ham radio literature.

The SolderSmoke Team Talks to the River City Amateur Radio Communication Society (Video)

Pete and I had a great time speaking to this really nice California ham radio club (video of the event appears above). Special thanks to club president Dr. Carol Milano, MD. Wow, what an impressive person and ham radio operator she is: https://www.qsl.net/kp4md/#New%20York
This club is doing a group build of a version of the famed Tuna Tin Two. I mentioned that I had held the original TTT in my hands, and that Rex Harper had conducted a “Mojo Transfer Ceremony” that imparted TTT Mojo to my BITX17 transceiver (which was also discussed). I promised to share the video of that momentous event. Here it is: https://youtu.be/9RZRaFUtTcc
Thanks to Carol and the members of the RCARCS. This was a lot of fun.

Improving the Product Detector in the Lafayette HA-600A

Diode product detector on the left, BFO amp in the right

As noted in an earlier blog post, I didn’t like the sound of SSB and CW when using the product detector in my Lafayette HA-600A. It just did not sound right. The receiver sounded fine on AM with the diode detector. But when I switched in the product detector, it sounded bad. The BFO was fine. The problem was there even when I used an external BFO. And SSB sounded great when I just coupled some BFO energy into the IF chain and used the diode detector to listen to SSB. My suspicions were focusing on the very simple BJT product detector.

Steve N8NM built the HA-600A product detector both in LTSpice and in the real world. It worked fine in both versions. Steve even put the product detector into his S-38 receiver — he reported it worked well there.

I too built the thing in LTSpice. Then I went and rebuilt the circuit on a piece of PC board. I connected the new circuit to the HA-600A, using my external FeelTech sig generator as the BFO. IT STILL SOUNDED BAD ON SSB.

At this point I started Googling through the literature. I found a promising article by Robert Sherwood in December 1977 issue of Ham Radio magazine entitled “Present Day Receivers — Problems and Cures.” Sherwood wrote:

“Another area that could use additional work is the product detector. As the name implies, its output should be the product of the two input signals. If BFO injection is removed, output should go to zero. If this is not the case, as in the Heath HW series, envelope detection is also occurring, which causes audio distortion.”

I checked my circuit. When I removed the BFO signal from the product detector, envelope detection continued. In fact, with the receiver in SSB mode, and with the BFO disconnected, I could listen to the music of WRMI shortwave. It seemed that Sherwood was explaining well the problem I was having: Simultaneous envelope and product detection was making SSB sound very bad in my receiver. What I was hearing just seemed to SOUND like what you’d get with a mixture of product and envelope detection: “scratchy” sounding SSB. This also seemed to explain why SSB would sound fine when using the diode detector with loosely coupled BFO energy — in that case it would be envelope detection only, with no ugly mixture of both kinds of detection.

So I built a better detector. I had had great luck with the two diode one trifilar transformer singly balanced design used by both Doug DeMaw and Ashhar Farhan. I built the circuit using one of the trifilar toroids given to me by Farhan, and connected it in place of the original BJT product detector. With the FeelTech Sig Gen as BFO, I got good results — most of the signal disappeared with I disconnected the BFO. Looking at the circuit, I realized that I was balancing out not the IF signal but instead the BFO signal. To minimize envelope detection I needed to put the IF signal on the balanced input of the product detector (to L1 in the diagram above). When I did this, envelope detection seemed to disappear completely and the receiver went silent when I disconnected the BFO.


Finally, I needed to find a way to use the BFO in the HA-600A with the new product detector. Obviously I needed more BFO signal — I needed about 7 dbm, enough to turn on the diodes. I converted the outboard product detector board into a simple amplifier and put it between the HA-600A BFO and the BFO input port of the new product detector. This works fine.

A few issues remain:

1) The output from the HA-600A BFO through the above BFO amp (and across the 50 ohm resistor) is NOT a pretty 455 kc sine wave. But the peaks of the distorted wave appear to be enough to turn on the diodes, and when I look at the voltages across each diode (on my two channel ‘scope) I see mirror images — one is on when the other is off. Is this good enough?

2) Moving the BFO input from L1 to the junction of the two 50 ohm resistors (that is actually a 100 ohm pot) has big implications for how this mixer works. With the BFO energy going through the toroid, BOTH diodes are being alternately turned on and turned off. But both are on, and then BOTH are off. With the BFO energy going in through the other side, one diode turns on when the other is off. I think the mixing result is the same, with AF coming out of the output port, but the way the mixer works in this configuration is very different. Does this sound right?

VK2SJA’s Minima in a Realistic DX-100 Case

Steve, VK2SJA, is doing to a Realistic DX-100 what I have been thinking about doing to a Heathkit HW-101. With this kind of encouragement, who could blame me for making a Minima-101? I’ve been planning on keeping the 6146s and all the final (and perhaps driver) circuitry.

Here is Steve’s very nice description of his project thus far:

http://www.hfsignals.org/index.php/UnRealistic_Minima

Our book: “SolderSmoke — Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics” http://soldersmoke.com/book.htm Our coffee mugs, T-Shirts, bumper stickers: http://www.cafepress.com/SolderSmoke Our Book Store: http://astore.amazon.com/contracross-20

SolderSmoke Podcast #154

SolderSmoke Podcast 154 is available for download!

http://soldersmoke.com/soldersmoke154.mp3

August 11, 2013

— Alligators! Real Alligators! (see picture below — look closely)

— Ten meter beacon project (with Arduino and Reverse Beacon Network)

— Telescope repair: Chap Stick as lubricant, and the perils of macular pucker!

— HW-101 saved from cannibalism!

— The Wonders of WSPR and our need for instant feedback and gratification.

— QST Review of SolderSmoke, The Book.

— MAILBAG

Our book: “SolderSmoke — Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics” http://soldersmoke.com/book.htm Our coffee mugs, T-Shirts, bumper stickers: http://www.cafepress.com/SolderSmoke Our Book Store: http://astore.amazon.com/contracross-20

Soul in the Old Machine: HW-101 Saved From Workshop Cannabilism

Most of our correspondents did not like the idea of me trying to convert my Heath HW-101 into a BITX-101. But, thinking that I still might to this, I decided to take the old rig off the shelf and see what it looked like. I liked the looks of it — lots of space, simple circuitry, nice belts and gears for turning the many variable capacitors, no black box ICs. I could see traces of my earlier repair adventures — electrolytic caps that had been replaced, the plastic dial clutch that I’d “fabricated” myself. Then I decided to try to fire it up. Hey, the receiver sounded very good. Next thing you know, I was getting the transmitter going. Then I was working DX on 20. By the end of the afternoon, I knew there was no way I would be tearing this old rig apart. There is simply too much soul in this old machine.

More on this in SolderSmoke 154….

Our book: “SolderSmoke — Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics” http://soldersmoke.com/book.htm Our coffee mugs, T-Shirts, bumper stickers: http://www.cafepress.com/SolderSmoke Our Book Store: http://astore.amazon.com/contracross-20

HB-101 ? BITX-101?

OK, so I’ve been wanting to build a BITX-20 for a long time. Then Steve “Snort Rosin” Smith sent me a nice 9 MHz filter, and I started to think about using it to build a BITX 75/20. But I don’t really like 75 meters too much… And I have this Heathkit HW-101. I like it very much, but these rigs do not age well: Too much heat, too many cheap components, tubes on PC boards… yuck. I got tired of fixing it. I’ve occasionally fantasized about scrapping most of the HW-101 circuitry and turning this rig into a 100 watt linear amplifier. But I didn’t have the heart to do this. Then, on the way to work yesterday it hit me: Why not take the beautiful bi-directional circuitry of Farhan’s BITX design and use that to solid state most of the HW-101? Obviously I’d retain the finals and maybe the driver, and the CW and SSB filters. The VFO could be transistorized. Maybe I’d retain the tube AF amp. I’d like to add 17 meter capability. Pete Juliano took an HW-101 and added a digital dial (that’s his rig in the picture).
What do you guys think? Am I nuts? Or would this be a worthwhile project?

Our book: “SolderSmoke — Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics” http://soldersmoke.com/book.htm Our coffee mugs, T-Shirts, bumper stickers: http://www.cafepress.com/SolderSmoke Our Book Store: http://astore.amazon.com/contracross-20