Category: BITX40Module
Hot Water BITX 40
Fred’s idea really resonated with me. My first SSB rig was an HW-32A, the 20 meter version of the rig shown above. If — as I suspect — these rigs are anything like the HW-101, they are not aging well. Heath’s drive for economy resulted in rigs that don’t hold up to well over time. I remember the sound of the plastic HW-101 dial clutch cracking when I pushed the button.
BITX40 Modules to the rescue! Put a mono-band board inside an old mono-band rig. There are a lot of possibility here. Some ideas:
— Put that Heath VFO to use. Maybe convert it to solid state. Or just put the LCD from an Si5351 in the window (Pete did this with an HW-101).
— Get the S-Meter wiggling.
— Keep the final amplifier circuitry in there and let the BITX drive it. This will give you a QRO option. (Uh oh, we’re in trouble again!)
KC1FSZ’s Peppermint Bark BITX: Aeronautical Mobile for his FIRST QSO. TRGHS.
Bill and Pete:
- First real QSO of my life was with KE4TJB “air-born mobile” off Delaware. He is a commercial pilot flying for JetBlue and apparently has time to work QRP stations during flights?? I wonder who was flying the plane?
- Then I was scanning around this morning and caught K4HW making last calls for check-ins on a net running on 7242 out of North Carolina. I decided to give it a shot, having never joined an HF net and I was recognized! As the first round got going I realized I had joined a Jehovah’s Witnesses net. They were very friendly and the net control stopped to help my get my frequency calibrated before they continued with the scripture passage for the week.
- Later this morning I reached K3KLC in Maryland who had the high-end SDR rig with the waterfall/panadaptor/etc. Remembering comments that you guys have made about these types of folks on 40m, I was very concerned. But this guy turned out to be very helpful and sent me some screen shots showing what my signal looks like.
Beyond Al Fresco: Boxed Up In Style with AB1YK’s Very Cool BITX Box
Mike AB1YK is doing some excellent work boxing up the BITX.
Check out his article on the Nashua Area Radio Club Blog:
http://n1fd.org/2017/02/28/my-ssb-bitx-40-build-from-vu2ese/
Here is a picture of Mike’s case:
These enclosures might become available for purchase soon…
Jim WA7HRG’s Beautiful Popcorn BITX
Popcorn Radio
The main chassis. Across the back left to right are power input, spk jack, mic/PTT jack, ant connector, and 5/20 watt switch. Far right is the PA heat sink. A 1x.5×4″ aluminum bar. It’s what I had… Lower right corner is the tune push button and if you look close in the upper left corner of the main board is a mini relay glued to the board near the bal modulator. That unbalances the modulator and provides a carrier for antenna tuning. Upper left of the box below the power connector is the USB Sound Card for the PC interface. And a couple extra input wires I ended up not using. Below that is the standard Nano and si5351.
Last but not least is the 2.2″ TFT. All functions power, mode, etc., are DC switched. I also use that as inputs to the Nano for display changes. I sense the 12 v relay voltages and through a voltage divider to input pins.
It’s back to my General Coverage Rec that I started but never finished.
VU2XE’s BITX40 (with a cool CAD box)
A year or so ago Pete and I encouraged Kiran VU2XE to try the BITX. He followed through, on our suggestion and went a step further, using CAD to design a box for the BITX. I will try to post a link to Kiran’s CAD files on the BITXHACKS blog.
Kiran writes:
Hi Bill and Pete,
New Posts to BITX HACKS
Don’t miss the new posts on the BITX HACKS blog. There are some great ideas from Don ND6T and some wonderful tribal knowledge from Pete N6QW.
http://bitxhacks.blogspot.com/
Ken G4IIB’s BITX Journey
Many thanks for your respective responses to my plea for help in setting up SI5351 derived BFO to my BITX40 board. You were both on the money.
Pete suggested that I had too much gain in my HB amplifier from the SI5351 output to the modulator and indeed that proved to be true. Once sorted I also noted that I was getting extra hiss on switching to one of the sidebands as you pointed out Bill this proved to be due to incorrect placement of that particular BFO frequency.
These BITX40 boards that Ash Farhan has developed and released to the world wide community of Radio Amateurs are worth every penny. Because they are so hackable (not just the circuitry but now the Raduino code also) it means that you can tailor it to your specific specification and in the process you are likely to learn new stuff and make new friends. I describe my BITX40 incarnation and experiences below:
Upon first firing up the BITX I was getting quite a lot of mains hum from my PSU’s (I thought that at least one of these PSU’s was a quality item) but obviously not up to the job. I constructed a simple one transistor capacitor multiplier (this converted a humble 1000uF cap into a 1F cap) and the noise magically disappeared. By coincidence I note that Bill discussed this technique in a recent pod cast. Another advantage of this technique was that I got a 2V drop across the transistor so by running this on 13.8V I get 12V out so I run the PA section on un-smoothed 13.8V (this gives me 12 watts of RF out) and run the receiver section on the smoothed 12V output from the multiplier, happy days.
My thoughts were to turn my BITX into a multi band (several bands rather than all bands) rig and I figured that using high side mixing (running the VFO at 19Mhz (12Mhz + 7 Mhz) rather than the existing low side mixing (12Mhz – 7Mhz=5Mhz VFO)) would be a better option. For example running it on 17M would mean using high side VFO anyway. I also wanted the ability to be able to switch sidebands especially on the lower frequencies so that I could use the rig for Digital modes in my case this was to be achieved by coding the Arduino to run a BFO on one of the SI5351’s clk ports.
I bought my BITX prior to the release of the Raduino so I had already commenced (with the aid of a new found radio friend and RF mentor) coding an Arduino VFO/BFO using a UNO and SI5351. Like I said at the beginning once you let folk know that you are starting on a new and interesting project you start to engage the more practical members of the ham community and they just want to get involved and help. Yet another good reason to buy a BITX . We used code originally developed by Jason Mildrum NT7S and Przemek Sadowski SQ9NJE and tailored it to suit the BITX40 and our requirements. This include high side VFO with frequency step adjustment and a BFO with long push BFO changeover. This meant that my BITX front panel should stay very minimalistic 2 knobs.
Getting the VFO to work was simple as the DDS socket was used and to better accommodate the high side VFO I modified the board by tombstoning caps C91 & C92.
Getting the BFO to work proved to be more problematic I was troubled with hiss and other noise. Words of wisdom from Pete Juliano when asked if I was doing something wrong were: ” No –it is just that we tend to think our projects are like Lego type building blocks where everything mates and snaps together. Sometimes more is required”. True Pete and that gives us the opportunity to learn new stuff!
To cut a long story short I found that the best place to connect the BFO was on the modulation transformer T4 thus bypassing the BITX BFO stage altogether. I was also getting hash noise believed to be emanating from the Uno. At this stage my after market Raduino arrived from India. I fired this up and noticed that I was not getting any hash noise from it. This pointed us to a coding problem and the LCD refresh was altered on our code and the problem disappeared. Below a picture of the module showing the BFO connections to T4 and the large heat-sink with the IRF510 insulated from it. Also shown is the capacitor multiplier and a glimpse of the Raduino in the foreground. Not the most elegant box but this is likely to change pending further refinements. It’s still work in progress and this box gives me plenty of room.
The Raduino is a fantastic piece of kit for the money extremely neat and well thought out. The coding is comprehensive and innovative and works well. However, from an aesthetic and ergonomic point of view there were a few things that I personally did not like in terms of how it operates and performs. I could not get away with the potentiometer tuning, you can tune 50Khz of the band and then when you near the pot edge it increments/decrements and you can re-tune. I found this clunky to use and in addition the Raduino would hunt causing the last digit to increment then decrement causing an annoying warble on audio. In my opinion a Rotary Encoder would be better solution. On the plus side, although not mentioned on the Hfsigs web site the Raduino code does come with other functions such as changing sidebands by temporary high siding the mixer, a RIT, VFO B and CW tone. If you download and read the Raduino code from Github you will see this extra functionality which I believe you can make use of via extra switches (not supplied). The current Raduino code does not have any external BFO options as said it relies on the crystal BFO and temporally high siding the VFO to change from LSB to USB on 7Mhz.
The Raduino module itself is just too good and neat not to use. As I did not have the where for all to fully understand and amend Ash’s code I decided to use the Raduino but to load it with the code that we have developed for he Uno and Addafruit SI5351 board. This would give me near conventional tuning via a rotary encoder, adjustable step sizes via quick push of the encoder switch and USB/ LSB switching via long push of the encoder switch by virtue of the SI5351 generating the BFO frequency. I have retained a copy of Ash’s Raduino code just in case I wish to revert to it. I put a new header on the Raduino P3 connector so that I could connect a rotary encoder and use the 2nd clock output and then changed our code to run on a Nano. I had to add a correction factor in the code to cater for calibration differences in the SI5351’s (in my case 1.21Khz).
As previously indicated I had a little trouble arriving at the correct BFO frequencies I found that 119940 and 119970 gave me LSB and USB respectively for my high side VFO (19Mhz) if you use low side VFO (5Mhz) then these would be reversed. We further refined these frequencies by injecting white noise into the mic amp and looked at each transmitted sideband on my RTL-SDR dongle via HDSDR (a useful piece of test equipment). By adjusting the carrier trimmer to show the carrier in the extended HDSDR spectrum display we could see how much to move the BFO frequency to best occupy the crystal filter pass band, see image below. This frequency adjustment being achieved by a coding change. The frequencies I consolidated on to cater for my particular crystal filter are 119941 LSB and 119969 USB. We then nulled the carrier back out. My audio is now as smooth as a maiden’s inner thigh, trust me the image will follow!
In the mean time folk should just get a BITX40, hack it to bits and share with us their customised versions.
VK3YE’s GREAT “QRP by the Bay” Event
Last weekend Homebrew Hero Peter Parker VK3YE hosted another of his amazing twice-yearly QRP events. It was at a park near the iconic Chelsea Pier in Melbourne. Peter Marks VK2TPM sent a very nice write-up with pictures:
http://blog.marxy.org/2017/02/qrp-by-bay.html
And a nice audio report:
http://s3.marxy.org.s3.amazonaws.com/audio/QRP_By_the_Bay_2017.wav
Peter Marks reports that most of the on-the-air activity was on the 120 foot ham band (40 meters for you modernists). Many BITX40’s were on display.
ZL1UEM’S Tiny OLED Si5351 Arduino VFO
First let me say that I have been an avid follower of the SS blog and podcasts since the days of your podcasts involving Mike KL7R.
Like many others I was tempted to purchase the $49 surface mount module from HF Signals. As a keen home brewer I felt guilty about employing a prebuilt board but excused my decision on the grounds that I would build a DDS and other accessories myself.
In addition to follow the SS blog I also check Pete’s blog regularly and was excited by his OLED VFO for the Bitx40.
I constructed it on a small double sided matrix board with plated through holes. A bit of noodling led to the layout shown in the photos. There is only one board with components mounted on both sides. The board came to life on the first power up but the text spilled off the bottom of the display.
I assumed that the sketch that I had downloaded from Pete’s blog was for a different OLED module. I knew that he had also used a yellow/blue OLED, the same as mine, previously so emailed him requesting a sketch for this OLED.
I was taken aback when he informed me that the sketch I had was the same for both the dual colour OLED and the black and white one too. Pete suggested that I swot up on the use of OLEDs generally and that perhaps I should first experiment with the text size to begin with. He also offered some advice about the mapping of the screen.
I soon discovered that the text size was not the cause of my grief and that I needed to look elsewhere.
I first tried running the ssd1306_128x64_I2c sketch from the sample sketch folder and was rewarded with the message “Height incorrect, please fix Adafruit _SSD1306.h”. A search of the Internet revealed that I needed to edit the .h file and find “#define SSD1306_128_64” which was commented out and uncomment it and make sure that the other two options, _32 and _16, were commented out.
My next problem was how to edit the specified .h file. I tried notepad but the text all ran together. Another internet search revealed that Notepad++ was a suitable choice and it did indeed cut the mustard.
A reload of the sketch completely restored the display to full functionality.
All this may be obvious to many but it was all new to me and if I had not been prompted by Pete l would not have had learnt so much and would not have had the same sense of achievement when it all came together.
Many thanks to you and Pete for providing a focus for my hobby.
73’s
Hugh ZL1UEM
W8LM’s BITX on a Board
W8LM wrote (on the BITX20 group):
Guys- Here are pix’s of my BITX40 fired up today in Receive for testing. #1 I have the tuning clicks- so I will be debugging that. #2 shown in the pictures is my test of calibration which was not necessary. I used a T and put my ICOM 756proII and the BITX40 on the same antenna (a Windom flat top at 33Ft) The display of both read 7.1700 pretty much the center of the band and I was copying 4’s,8’s and 2’s at 23:30zulu) By moving volume controls up and down I could listen to both rigs same frequency, audio comparison acceptable. An AGC circuit is in order. The mylar-plastic cone of the surplus speaker lacks fidelity. Unfortunately the 16×2 display did photograph well. It’s a start– de W8LM
A Mighty Mite, a BITX40, an ILER, some Arduinos, and the Joy of Oscillation in the United Arab Emirates
Martin A65DC sent us this wonderful report on his efforts in the UAE. His e-mail nicely conveys his enthusiasm. I was especially pleased to see that wooden enclosures are catching on (another fellow on the BITX20 group is using a cigar humidor). Thanks Martin! Please keep us posted on your UAE homebrew adventures.
Hi Bill and Pete,
SolderSmoke Podcast #193: BITX 40, OLEDs, KWM-4, Noise Abatement
— Check out the BITXHACKS page. Send in contributions.
— BITX20 mailing list very active.
— Raduino!
— Interview with Farhan with W5KUB — Eliminating the commercial gear.
— BITX 40s on the beach in Australia. FB
— Color Displays!
— KWM-4
— OLED MADNESS!
— Fixing up the old HT-37 HT37 to HT37 QSO with W1ZB
— Dabbling in VHF with Ramsey Aircraft band receiver. NOT FUN.
— Going all IC with Si5351 OLED NE602 rig.
— BANDSWEEP
— OLED Noise and the Active Decoupling solution.
Ian G3ROO Origins of ROO Regen at age 8
Hans Summers G0UPL Balloons! NO COMMECIAL GEAR
David White WN5Y ELECTROLUMINESCENT RECEIVER EXPLAINED
Rob Sherwood NC0B
Jerry W0PWE built a DIGITIA! Very nice. Worked Keith N6ORS and heard me! TRGHS
Mike AB1YK’s Al Fresco Scratch built BITX. But give that LC VFO another chance Mike!
Steve N8NM 30 meter rig with salvaged CB LC VFO. FB
Keith N6ORS Franken SDR rig with parts from the 1980s. FB
SKN Bandscan from Mike WA6ARA I worked W1PID Jim!
What is Mikele up to?
Rocking Johannesburg and Kirghizstan via local repeaters:
KD4PBJ’s FB BITX 40
Hi Guys!
I have to admit something. It’s a learning experience.
A year or two ago I bought the Bitx boards from Sunil in India and while they are on the To Do list, haven’t been built up yet. I have close to 20 projects on my to do list, so when Farhan’s prebuilt SMT version became available I decided to get one.
I had gone over to TenTec before they shut down and bought a few of their two piece enclosures since I like how attractive they are and also inexpensive.
The Bitx went into the enclosure quickly and I measured a little over 10 W out with my scope. I fed a -125 dBm signal in using my HP8640 generator and could easily hear the tone.
So a really sensitive receiver. Nice and quiet too!
I got a SMT digital dial from QRP Guys and got it in the case. Now I heard a high pitched whine in the background. Nuts!
So I posted to the Bitx yahoo group asking for help in reducing the noise. I built a R/L/C filter network, added ferrites, built a copper clad and brass enclosure for the display. Nada. Noise still there. Adding adhesive copper tape didn’t help either.
This was driving me mad. For some reason, and I don’t know why, one evening I decided to try a gel cell. Success!!! No noise whatsoever.
Here’s what happened….
When I first built the radio in early December I tested it on my operating bench. On that bench is a older Power Designs 0-60V 0-5A linear bench supply.
After adding the display I did integration on my soldering lab bench and for that I grabbed my HP E3610 supply which it turns out is heavy but switching, not linear. The noise was coming from the supply!!
If I hadn’t tried the gel cell it may have taken me a long time to figure this out.
Saturday of last week was my first contact with it. I worked two Canadian stations with it, and both came back to me the first time after I answered their CQ’s. I did have one issue and that’s the well documented drift. During the QSO I watched the display drift upwards as I held the PTT button down. I replaced the 100 pF and 47 pF chip caps in the VFO with disc ceramic parts from Mouser and now it doesn’t drift.
While doing the work in the VFO section I also tweaked the trimmer cap a bit to bring the bottom range up to the start of the phone band, as before the bottom end was below 7 MHz and I figured that didn’t do me much good for a SSB rig to waste a lot of its tuning range on the CW segment.
Here are a few pictures. Mic is home brew too, having made it for my MMR-40 rig.
Hope all is going well for you and looking forward to the next Solder Smoke.
Chris KD4PBJ
BITX40 to BITX40 In Australia — Both Rigs on the Beach, Video at Both Ends
There is so much great homebrewing going on down-under. It makes me jealous. And so much of it is for phone. FB.
I really like VK3YE’s sand graphic proclaiming to the world (or at least to the beach!) that a BITX40 to BITX40 contact had been made.
Looks like both rigs were using VK3YE’s ceramic resonator mod for the VFO.
Be sure to check out the BITX 40 Mods blog:
http://bitxhacks.blogspot.com
Great Interview with Farhan Re BITX 40 and BITX History
W5KUB has a really good interview with Farhan. There are several spots where the Skype connection gets quite choppy, but hang in there — it gets better. Farhan provides a lot of good info on the history of the BITX rigs, his design philosophy, and the importance of the EMRFD book. He also talks about how the BITX 40 Module is produced. And he talks a bit about possible future rigs. Great stuff.
I was very pleased to hear that Farhan is trying to eliminate the need for his FT-817 (he currently needs it for its general coverage receiver) so that he can have a completely homebrew hamshack. FB!
A Nice History of BITX 40 Module: Production and Finance
Some fellow jumped into the BITX20 yahoo group this morning, casting aspersions on our friend Farhan. The fellow alleged that a lot of money was being made on the BITX 40. He seemed deeply unhappy about the shipping materials and found fault with the documentation that came with the boards.
Farhan came back with a very gentlemanly and detailed response. He was a lot more patient and temperate than I would have been. And when I think about how Pete would have responded, well, it would likely have involved — at the very least — a lot of colorful words from Southern Italy.
Anyway, below (unedited) is Farhan’s response. I think it provides a lot of very interesting background info on our beloved BITX 40 Module and on the place that these boards come from.
2.) Secondly, components and PCBs in the Indian market are generally available at a lower cost, sometimes much lower, than components purchased from prime US suppliers such as Mouser, Newark, etc. The US is one market, India is another. That’s the way it works. Components even cheaper than these: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Reel-O f-3000-MuRata-0-1uF-Multi-Laye r-Ceramic-Surface-Mount-Capaci tors-25V-X7R-/161765931843
What’s the current serial numbering up to as of December. Anyone know? It was #465 in early December. 465 units multiplied by $45 USD is about $21,000 USD. That converted to INR has the purchasing power in India of $70,000 USD here in the US. That’s a lot of bread.
What’s my point?
Seems like with that kind of wealth in play:
1.) The product could be double-boxed and well bubble-wrapped so it arrives undamaged after it’s 12,500+ km trip from Hyderabad. Old candy boxes or scraps of waste paper taped together just isn’t doing the job. Broken product means unhappy customers and a bad reputation.
2.) The single schematic that represents the functionality of the product could be up-to-date and error-free.
And for totally optional bonus points: A section by section Theory of Operation write-up that explains exactly how all the sections operate and how to troubleshoot. If a template is needed, look at vintage HP test instrument manuals or Heathkit ham radio transceiver manuals. Hint: Saying that, “It’s all been explained many times before on many forums, Google it.” does not get any points.
Big News! BITX 40 Module Gets Digi Side Car! Raduino!
A very nice Christmas present from Farhan in Hyderabad! An Si5351/Arduino Nano VFO for the ALREADY AWESOME BITX 40 Module. I’m really glad Farhan kept the digital stuff on a separate board — it just seems like the right way to do it.
Details on http://hfsigs.com
SolderSmoke Podcast #192 FPM Rig, BITX Module Madness, HRO Al Fresco, Boatanchor Day, Mailbag
SolderSmoke Podcast #192 is available:
http://soldersmoke.com/soldersmoke192.mp3


























