This guy has some amazing tools, and even more amazing skills. I find it inspirational to occasionally take a look at other kinds of workshops. Check it out. Video above.
Along similar lines, the young Englishman Leo was in Washington state with his girlfriend when the lock-down and travel bans kicked in, so his work on Tally Ho (and his videos) continue. See:
https://youtu.be/zXV0ywqj7zY
SITS! or Stay in the wood-shop!
Author: Peter Marks
Brace Yourselves: DK7IH’s New Transceiver — The Gimme Five
Videos on the Q-31 Quarantine AM SW Receiver Project (and some pictures)
I’ve been making some short, stage-by-stage videos of my Q-31 receiver project. So far I have seven videos. They are here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/M0HBR/videos
Please subscribe to my YouTube Channel. And give me some “thumbs up” if you like the videos.
Thanks. SITS! FlattenTheCurve! 73
![]() |
| Pads from Pete, toroids from Farhan |
![]() |
| The diode ring |
![]() |
| Altoids-sized tins will hold the circuit boards |
![]() |
| Stay In The Shack — Or in the front yard. |
Blog — “Chinese Electronics Products Tested”
I was looking for information on my FeelTech FY3200s Signal Generator. I came across a very informative blog; it covers a variety of other Chinese gear and parts.
Here is the Feeltech FY3200S article:
https://chinese-electronics-products-tested.blogspot.com/p/fy3200s-function-generator-tested.html
Here is the home page of the blog:
https://chinese-electronics-products-tested.blogspot.com/
And here is backround information on the author:
WB9IWT’s Quarantine Mighty Mite and N3FJZ’s “Hiram Percy Maxim Recognition Factor”
Leif WB9IWT has, during the emergency, been working on a Michigan Mighty Mite (See pictures above and below). FB Leif.
But also check out the very astute comment from Rick N3FJZ (below) . I am, of course, all in favor of the HPMR Factor. Almost all of my rigs would score quite high. Others, I know, would seek a low score. To each his own. This is all for fun.
Leif,
Great work. If a ham from the 1920’s were to see this rig, they
probably wouldn’t recognize the actual components right away (but
knowing hams, they would no doubt figure it out), but the breadboard
layout circuit flow would be immediately recognizable; e.g. the plug-in
crystal, the coil, binding post. The transistor and variable capacitor
may baffle them at first, but seeing there are three leads on the
transistor would start to give them clues.
That’s the cool part about analog discrete component radio, no matter
how many years go by, and the appearance and size of the actual
components change, the physics of what’s going on at the electron level
stays the same (SDR not withstanding).
I guess this could be a litmus test for us analog radio builders. It
could be called the “Hiram Percy Maxim Recognition Factor” or “HPMR
Factor” with a range of 0 to 1. After you build your rig, take a look
at it and pretend that you could present it to Mr. Maxim and the more he
could understand the circuits, components and circuit flow on his own,
the closer to a factor of 1 your radio would achieve. For example, an
SDR might only achieve a factor of .1 or even maybe 0, where as your rig
may achieve a factor of .8, and one of your crystal receivers would
definitely get a 1.
Someone could even workout a check list or formula where you would add
or subtract some fractional numeric values for each component you used;
e.g. you would subtract some value for every IC chip, microprocessor or
LCD display you use, and add some fractional value for each hand wound
coil, vacuum tube/valve or open air variable capacitor, et cetera.
Fun to think about.
Keep building.
Rick – N3FJZ
Quarantine Reading: Tribal Knowledge: Two Gems from Pete Juliano N6QW
ZL2CTM Charlie Morris on “QSO Today” with Eric Guth 4Z1UG
Eric Guth 4Z1UG had a really nice interview with our friend Charlie Morris ZL2CTM. Charlie shared with Eric a lot of wisdom about how to homebrew radio gear. I especially liked Charlie’s comments on keeping most of his rigs on the wooden prototype boards. He said something important when he talked about the benefits of taking a break from a difficult problem, then coming back to it with a rested and refreshed mind. I noted, however, that he said most of these frustrating problems have to do with software.
I got got several chuckles out of Charlie’s comments on the difficulty of building stable analog LC VFOs (here he seemed to be channeling our good friend Pete Juliano). I chuckled because as I listened I was happily building the analog LC VFO for my Q-31 Quarantine receiver. The centerpiece of this project is a variable capacitor that Pete gave me; Pete took it out of an old Galaxy V transceiver. Believe me guys, no rotary encoder could possibly look as nice or have as much soul as that capacitor from Pete, with all its gears, reduction drives, and anti-backlash mechanisms. It even smells of machine oil. Call me a Luddite, but I will stick with the coils and capacitors.
Listen to the interview here:
https://www.qsotoday.com/podcasts/zl2ctm
Thanks to Charlie and Eric.
The Low-Cost, Open Source COVID-19 Ventilator that Farhan is Helping to Build (Video)
While many of us are just trying to pass the time by building Quarantine ham radio rigs, our good friend Farhan VU2ESE has been hard at work on a really serious project: He has been working out how to use an Arduino microcontroller as the electronic core of a simple ventilator that could save thousands of lives in the current crisis. See video above.
Here is background info on the project (from ARRL):
03/23/2020
More details on the project here:
https://github.com/afarhan/osventproto
Please pass the word on this project. Please forward on Facebook, Re-tweet, etc.
Quarantine Project: An AM Receiver for the 31 Meter Band. The Q-31.
73 Bill
SolderSmoke Podcast #220 — S-38Es, AD9833s, Pete’s Phasing Rig, FT-8
![]() |
| Java on the S-38E Tuning Dial |
SolderSmoke Podcast #220 is available
Quarantine Rig: VK3YE Resurrects an Old BITX Project
I think we should start calling these “Quarantine Rigs.” Many of us are pulling off the shelves rigs that we started a while back but then put aside. Now, with the pandemic, we have the time (and the need!) to work on them.
I like Peter’s BITX receiver video, especially the part in the beginning where he wipes the grime and oxidation off the long-neglected copper-clad board.
Follow Peter’s lead: Pull those old projects off the shelf. Get them going. Now is the time. SITS! Melt solder and flatten the curve.
Thanks Peter.
Paul VK3HN’s Portable Rig
Nice work Paul.
Excellent Video on Maxwell’s Equations
Really well-done. He gets to the essence without getting bogged down in the math. Great graphics too.
How They Make Chips That No One Can Understand
Radio History Question: Why 455 kHz as the IF frequency?
My work on the S-38Es, on the HRO-dial receiver, on the Mate for the Mighty Midget, and on various mechanical filters has caused me to think (once again) about why we ended up with 455 kHz as the IF frequency for so many radios. I’ve heard many explanations for this, but unfortunately I’ve forgotten the explanations and lost the sources. I started digging into this again today. I found the below e-mail from Al N3FRQ on the Boatanchors mailing list (2008).
I contacted Al to find out if he had learned anything else on this topic. He has not. So if anyone out there has answers to Al’s questions, or anyother info that would shed light on why they went with 455, please let us know.
——————————-
Every so often the question comes up: Why are all the IF’s 455 KHz? I’d like to get an article together that solves this riddle while the people who know are still with us. I know parts of the story, but I need help with a couple of issues. There are two major consideration is the choice of the intermediate frequency used in a superheterodyne receiver. The lower the frequency, the easier it is to attain high selectivity. Also, in the early days, before tetrode and pentode tubes, it was easier to achieve a high degree of amplification at lower frequencies. Conversely, a higher IF frequency results in better image rejection. Early superhets had the IF at 100KHz or lower in order to get adequate gain from the available triode tubes. They suffer severely from “two-spot tuning” (images). By the early 1930’s, broadcast set had settled in at 175KHz, and automobile receivers would later adopt 262KHz as a standard. The advent of the short-wave craze, and multi-band broadcast receivers dictated a higher IF frequency to achieve adequate image suppression on the short-wave bands. The broadcast band occupied 550-1500KHz at this time, and the designer encounters sever problems if his radio tunes across it’s own IF. Some shortwave sets used 1600-1700KHz for better image rejection, but one couldn’t go higher if the 160-meter ham band (1800-2000KHZ) was to be covered. Most multi-band receiver settled in near 450KHz, a comfortable distance from the first broadcast channel at 550KHz. Questions: Odd multiples of 5KHz, 455, 465, etc., were usually chosen so that the image of the carrier of a broadcast-band station could be zero-beat with the carrier of the station being tuned to achieve minimal interference. (This assumes 10KHz channel spacing. Did the Europeans (9KHz) do something else?) The Radiotron Designers Handbook, Third Edition, p. 159, states “A frequency of 455 Kc/s is receiving universal acceptance as a standard frequency, and efforts are being made to maintain this frequency free from radio interference.” (1) Do FCC and international frequency allocations reflect this? (2) I’ve heard the term “Clear-Channel IF.” Can anyone cite references? (3) At lease one news group posting claims that broadcast frequencies in a particular market are assigned to prevent strong inter-modulation products from falling near 455KHz. Is this factual? Need reference.” (4) Was this (3) at least part of the reason for “Radio Moving Day” in 1941? See: http://www.dcmemories.com/RadioMovingDay/ 032341WINXFreqChange.jpg (5) Many National Radio sets used a 456KHz IF’s and I think I remember a 437 somewhere. Why? Are there different considerations for short-wave CW operation? Further input, corrections, and elaborations are greatly appreciated. Scolarly reference will be looked upon with great favor. Regards, Al -- Al Klase - N3FRQ Flemington, NJ http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/
Mr. Carlson Restores an All-American Five — Tribal Knowledge! SITS! Flattening the Curve! (video)
It is always a pleasure to see a new video on Mr. Carlson’s awesome YouTube channel, especially in these days of Staying-In-The-Shack (SITS). Obviously Mr. Carlson is doing his bit in this area. FLATTEN THE CURVE! Thanks OM!
My recent bout of S-38E madness has peaked my interest in the All American Five design, so this March 10, 2020 video was especially interesting to me. Mr. Carlson puts out so much great tribal knowledge. I didn’t know about “rounder” resistors. I didn’t know that you have to be careful not to short out (to the IF can case!) the 455 kc transformers. I really like his approach to dial cord restoration.
Mr. Carlson’s discussion of the adjustment of the front end tuner circuit on this broadcast band radio was very interesting. Unlike the S-38 radios, there are no front end coils being switched in as you change bands. In fact, it appears that that big coil/antenna inside the back cardboard piece IS the front end coil. This discussion has caused me to question my front end alignment technique for the S-38E. Did I have an appropriate antenna or antenna substitute across the antenna terminal when I set the peak on the input LC circuit? I will check on this. Hooray! One more thing to do during the COVID-19 SITS period.
UPDATE: I checked on this using the test set up described in an earlier post, but this time with my antennas connected. First with a 40 meter dipole, then with my 130 foot doublet, then with a 50 ohm dummy load I was still able to see the resonance dips at exactly where I wanted them to be.
My favorite bit of Carlsonian wisdom from this video? Mr. C’s confirmation that some hum in All American Five receivers IS NORMAL! (This may be too much for the folks who find normal band noise to be offensive.)
For Inspiration and Education: Dean’s Radio Blog (with video)
Be sure to check out the blog of Dean KK4DAS. He is a new homebrewer who is having great success with one of Pete Juliano’s ingenious SSB designs. Dean has a video of his receiver working — AL FRESCO — as construction on the full transceiver proceeds.
This is amazing. Just a short time ago Dean was taking his first steps as a homebrewer with his version of the Michigan Mighty Mite. He has followed the advice of the Tribal Wizards and has proceeded slowly, step by step, stage by stage, gaining the experience that has allowed him to actually build a superhet receiver and be on the verge of completing a full SSB transceiver.
Lots of inspiration to be found on Dean’s blog. Check it out:
https://kk4das.blogspot.com/2020/03/dean-kk4dass-furlough-40-ssb-rig.html














