{"id":2682,"date":"2016-02-27T11:50:00","date_gmt":"2016-02-27T00:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/2016\/02\/27\/sputnik-replica-transmitter-an-error-in-the-sputnik-schematic-and-why-20-005-mhz\/"},"modified":"2025-07-21T13:43:58","modified_gmt":"2025-07-21T03:43:58","slug":"sputnik-replica-transmitter-an-error-in-the-sputnik-schematic-and-why-20-005-mhz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/2016\/02\/27\/sputnik-replica-transmitter-an-error-in-the-sputnik-schematic-and-why-20-005-mhz\/","title":{"rendered":"Sputnik Replica Transmitter, an &#8220;Error&#8221;  in the Sputnik Schematic, and Why 20.005 MHz?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;\"> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" content=\"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/sputnik.jpg\" height=\"225\" itemprop=\"image\" src=\"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/sputnik-tx-featured-image-800px.png\" width=\"400\" \/><\/div>\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;\"><\/div>\n<div> <b>Mark K6HX pointed me to very interesting <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/hackaday.com\/2016\/02\/23\/sputniks-transmitter-beeps-again\/\"><b>Hackaday article<\/b><\/a><b> on Frank PA3CNO&#8217;s Sputnik transmitter replica. As blog readers will recall, we went through a period of Sputnik-mania a few years ago: <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/soldersmoke.blogspot.com\/search?q=sputnik\"><b>http:\/\/soldersmoke.blogspot.com\/search?q=sputnik<\/b><\/a><b> Chief Designer Comrade Mikhail Rainey AA1TJ sent me some of the Russian tubes (like those pictured above). <\/b><\/div>\n<div> <b><br \/><\/b><\/div>\n<div> <b>The Hackaday article pointed to our post reporting that Oleg RV3GM had found the schematic:<\/b><\/div>\n<div> <a href=\"http:\/\/soldersmoke.blogspot.com\/2013\/04\/sputnik-schematic-found.html\"><b>http:\/\/soldersmoke.blogspot.com\/2013\/04\/sputnik-schematic-found.html<\/b><\/a><b> Stefan reports that PA3CNO found &#8220;an error&#8221; in the original Soviet schematic: <\/b><\/div>\n<div> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.radio.cc\/post\/Franks-power-supply-for-sputnik\"><b>http:\/\/www.radio.cc\/post\/Franks-power-supply-for-sputnik<\/b><\/a><b> A mistake you say? HAH, I say! Hah! This must have been part of a sinister commie plot to prevent the capitalist imperialists from ever being able to reproduce the glorious transmitter of the Soviet people. They almost succeeded. <\/b><\/div>\n<div> <b><br \/><\/b><\/div>\n<div> <b>Just kidding. <\/b><\/div>\n<div> <b><br \/><\/b><\/div>\n<div> <b>In the course of looking through our old Sputnik posts, I came across a question I posted: <\/b><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><i><br \/><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><i>I have a question: OK so the crafty Soviets picked 20.005 MHz for some good reasons: Being so close to the WWV freq, it would be easy for hams and SWLs to find it with precision. In the November\/December 2007 issue of &#8220;Break In&#8221; (from NZ &#8212; thanks Jonathan-san!) ZL3DW notes that this frequency selection would allow a receiver set to exactly 20 MHz to &#8220;produce an audio tone plus or minus the Doppler shift without ever going through zero beat.&#8221; But zero beat with what? Most of the receivers out there would not have had BFOs, right? So the Soviets wouldn&#8217;t have been using ordinary CW, right? Were they using AM, with the beeps produced by an audio oscillator modulating the carrier?<\/i> <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><br \/><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">Was their diabolical plan to use WWV as the BFO for those using ordinary AM SW receivers? If so, a 5 kHz separation from WWV seems to be too much right? Especially when the Doppler shift on approach would push the frequency up a bit. Maybe they just chose this freq to make it easy for listeners to find &#8212; just a bit above WWV. Comrade Rainey surmised that they were keying the PA stage &#8212; the oscillator &#8220;backwave&#8221; was at times audible on the ground. <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><br \/><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">What do you think Comrades? <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">DSW and 73.<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mark K6HX pointed me to very interesting Hackaday article on Frank PA3CNO&#8217;s Sputnik transmitter replica. As blog readers will recall, we went through a period of Sputnik-mania a few years ago: http:\/\/soldersmoke.blogspot.com\/search?q=sputnik Chief Designer Comrade Mikhail Rainey AA1TJ sent me some of the Russian tubes (like those pictured above). The Hackaday article pointed to our &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/2016\/02\/27\/sputnik-replica-transmitter-an-error-in-the-sputnik-schematic-and-why-20-005-mhz\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Sputnik Replica Transmitter, an &#8220;Error&#8221;  in the Sputnik Schematic, and Why 20.005 MHz?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2683,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[166,127,86,96,82,32,101],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-netherlands","category-new-zealand","category-rainey-michael","category-russia","category-satellites","category-space-program","category-tubes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2682"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2685,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2682\/revisions\/2685"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.homebrewradio.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}